This seems to be quite important for both NP and Political advocacy groups. Recording the CS mailing list thread on this
From: "GregoryHeller" <gregory@democracyrevisited.org>
Householding Exact Household Match After standardizing street number, name, apartment number All records with the same street number, name zip code and apartment number are assigned to the same household using a key [StNumber] & [StName] & [Zip] & [Apt] Flaws: using this method if voters in the same household have used different designations for apartment number, designations that cannot be standardized, or omitted an apartment number they will not be householded. Voters living in a private house are not accounted for in this method. Last Name Household Match For records with no apartment number After standardizing street number, name, All records with the same street number, name, zip code and last name are assigned to the same household using a key [StNumber] & [StName] & [Zip] & [LastName] Flaws: Voters with different st names living in the same house (private house or apartment without apartment number) well not be householded. The increase in non married couples living together, or hyphenated last names or women keeping their maiden names all detract from the efficacy of this method. Phone number Household Match: If the datafile is phone matched professionally, many vendors will append the phone number to all members of a household (not sure what their methodology is, if it goes beyond name/address style household matching, or if it comes from their telephone databases. Phone number can be used to identify households, though it does not necessarily identify all members of a household. Points of comparison that can be used to identify households when there is no apartment number: Partial Name Match: a comparison that looks for parts of names, either comparing the first few letters of last names or the last few letters of last names could help to identify hyphenated names. Age and gender can be used to identify likely members of a household. Records at the same address that are within a certain number of years (5 for example) in age and of opposite genders could be assumed to be members of the same household. Flaw: this does not account for roommates or same sex couples. Records where one is between 18 and 24 and the other(s) are 20 to 40 years older could identify children and their parents as members of the same household. Once the household has been identified there is the complex issue of household salutation for mailing purposes. In many cases a campaign may not want to mail to all members of the household (republican man, and dem women in the same household). We have created household salutations based upon the number of target voters in a household. For example: 1 Targeted voter: FirstName LastName 2 Targeted voters with same last name: FirstName1 & FirstName2 LastName 2 Targeted voters with different last name: FirstName1 LastName1 & FirstName2 LastName2 3 or more Targeted Voters: The LastName (picked at random) Household In the 3rd scenario, the last Name could be chosen based upon the most prevalent last name, or the last name of the oldest mail voters, or it could be a concatenation of last names of voters in the household (eg The Smith and Jones Household, or The Smith Jones Wilson Household The Household salutation could be The Smith Family if all the last names are Smith.
Labels:

1 Comment
Hide/Show CommentsDec 21, 2007
Shawn Duncan
When "Use Household Address" is selected for a contact with an existing relationship to a household it would be really nice if the proper household was already selected.